Close

Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:
Password:
Close

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Analysts  |  Earnings  |  Insiders

Woulfe Mining Corp C.WOF

Sector: Metals & Mining | Sub-Sector: Industrial Metals & Minerals
Alternate Symbol(s):  WFEMF

Woulfe Mining Corp is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.
Price: $0.06 | Change: $-0.005 | %Change: -7.69%
Volume: 23,000 | Day High/Low: 0.065/0.06 | 52 Week High/Low: 0.13/0.035
View modes: 
0 stars

RE:Woulfe for dummies

Enjoy the read. http://www.desertminesandmetals.com.au/ Yes, I've become disheartened with WOF.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:Critical Point

I just want to thank Volfram for taking the time to write this all out. Like always, very informative and you cover all of the important facts. Always feel good about my investment after you make it...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:Critical Point

I agree GaiusGermanicus that share buybacks programs can be good for investment value, but not in the manner that Almonty is using it.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:Critical Point

Actually share buyback programs are fairly good for investment value, though the value realized is indirect, as ts an anti-diluative action.  I LOVE Apple's stock buybacks as they've figured in no...read more
0 stars

RE:Critical Point

Wolfram....oh I agree there would have been a clear investible action plan if the Almonty merger went through. What I disagree with is your premise that there would have been future appreciation of...read more
0 stars

RE:Critical Point

74volfram wrote: - I think the objection or credible counter offer came from off-taker TaeguTec (IMC). Could be IMC did not like that Sangdong would end up in the hands of an independent tungsten...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:Woulfe for dummies

Macohead, you made some great points. We (myself included) need to be reminded sometimes the bottom line, at the end of the day, nothing really changed, even though it feels like it somehow. Thank you...read more
0 stars

Critical Point

With feasibiity out of the way, technical uncertainty is replaced by financing uncertainty and possibly issues of Canadian vs. Korean control of the mine.  Macos and GG are right a monkey should be...read more
0 stars

RE:Woulfe for dummies

Macohead wrote: A monkey could get this project started. I'll buy the little bugger a shovel, it'll quadruple his productivity, and thus double ours.  rate and reply
4 stars

Woulfe for dummies

Can someone please explain to me what the issue is here?    Woulfe owns 100% of an ecominally feasable tungsten mine, there is a processing plant being built pretty much next door, the govt is dying...read more
0 stars

I can't hold my breath any longer

Dutchmann you probably made the right move. What a scam I'm so angry I cant move I cant breath. what this proves ,once again, is anything out of Vancouver(stocks) is a SCAM !  rate and reply
3.5 stars

RE:RE:Start construction in June ? Probably not.

....this stock, company, board od directors, & dun dee is a bag of waste. I dumped my shares last week and never looking back. Get out with what you can.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:Start construction in June ? Probably not.

Your view of the current situation,is based on what you don't know.How is that you may ask?The feasibility study is not a"guestimate",of course that would depend on how you define it.There could be...read more
0 stars

YOUR RIGHT.

To 74volfram, posting can be addictive, if you have something new to say, and a few beers under the belt, plus an ability to tell the difference between s**t and clay. Very happy that the first...read more
0 stars

Is this the norm ?

Just wondering on the 7 odd post "pages" of the proposed merger @ 0.08c. i.e.  "OMG 0.08c" over and over Is this an unofficial way for stock holders to let the BOD's know that it;s not wanted and will...read more
0 stars

Start construction in June ? Probably not.

Unless they start pushing some dirt around the site and clearing land to make it look like something is happening.   A "feasability study" is a rough guestimate of the proposed underground, materials...read more
5 stars

RE:adding things up

Excellent analysis 74volfram of the fair market value of the  Sangdong Tungsten- Molybdenum Mine being at (.35c). Have we forgoten the the Muguk Gold Mine potential Value?. (.10c). And; other...read more
0 stars

adding things up

Adding up the few pieces of the puzzle we have available and make sense of the whole picture because it is actually quite interesting (WOF board posting can be addictive). Figuring out the mine...read more
0 stars

RE:Time for Change.......

Come up with a credible plan of action and I'll toss my fraction of a % in . . .  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:My theory

mtlimpact wrote: For now I am waiting and buying a few shares from time to time @ 0.065. for your information when broker 85 and 79 sell shares @ 0.065 it is because they are buying them on the US...read more